| rfc9893v1.txt | rfc9893.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Cheng | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Cheng | |||
| Request for Comments: 9893 MIT Lincoln Laboratory | Request for Comments: 9893 MIT Lincoln Laboratory | |||
| Category: Standards Track D. Wiggins | Category: Standards Track D. Wiggins | |||
| ISSN: 2070-1721 | ISSN: 2070-1721 | |||
| S. Ratliff | S. Ratliff | |||
| L. Berger | L. Berger | |||
| E. Kinzie, Ed. | E. Kinzie, Ed. | |||
| LabN Consulting, L.L.C. | LabN Consulting, L.L.C. | |||
| November 2025 | December 2025 | |||
| Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Credit-Based Flow Control Messages | Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Credit-Based Flow Control Messages | |||
| and Data Items | and Data Items | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document defines new Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Data | This document defines new Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Data | |||
| Items that are used to support credit-based flow control. Credit | Items that are used to support credit-based flow control. Credit | |||
| window control is used to regulate when data may be sent to an | window flow control is used to regulate when data may be sent to an | |||
| associated virtual or physical queue. These Data Items are | associated virtual or physical queue. These Data Items are | |||
| extensible and reusable. | extensible and reusable. | |||
| This document also defines new messages that support credit window | ||||
| flow control. | ||||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| This is an Internet Standards Track document. | This is an Internet Standards Track document. | |||
| This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force | This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force | |||
| (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has | (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has | |||
| received public review and has been approved for publication by the | received public review and has been approved for publication by the | |||
| Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on | Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on | |||
| Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. | Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. | |||
| skipping to change at line 57 ¶ | skipping to change at line 60 ¶ | |||
| carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
| to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | |||
| include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the | include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the | |||
| Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described | Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described | |||
| in the Revised BSD License. | in the Revised BSD License. | |||
| Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| 1.1. Key Words | 1.1. Key Words | |||
| 2. Credit Window Control | 2. Credit Window Flow Control | |||
| 2.1. Data Plane Considerations | 2.1. Data Plane Considerations | |||
| 2.2. Credit Window Messages | 2.2. Credit Window Messages | |||
| 2.2.1. Credit Control Message | 2.2.1. Credit Control Message | |||
| 2.2.2. Credit Control Response Message | 2.2.2. Credit Control Response Message | |||
| 2.3. Credit Window Control Data Items | 2.3. Data Items for the Control of Credit Windows | |||
| 2.3.1. Credit Window Initialization | 2.3.1. Credit Window Initialization | |||
| 2.3.2. Credit Window Association | 2.3.2. Credit Window Association | |||
| 2.3.3. Credit Window Grant | 2.3.3. Credit Window Grant | |||
| 2.3.4. Credit Window Status | 2.3.4. Credit Window Status | |||
| 2.3.5. Credit Window Request | 2.3.5. Credit Window Request | |||
| 2.4. Management Considerations | 2.4. Management Considerations | |||
| 3. Compatibility | 3. Compatibility | |||
| 4. Security Considerations | 4. Security Considerations | |||
| 5. IANA Considerations | 5. IANA Considerations | |||
| 5.1. Message Type Values | 5.1. Message Type Values | |||
| skipping to change at line 92 ¶ | skipping to change at line 95 ¶ | |||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| The Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP), defined in [RFC8175], | The Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP), defined in [RFC8175], | |||
| provides the exchange of link-related control information between | provides the exchange of link-related control information between | |||
| DLEP peers. DLEP peers are comprised of a modem and a router. DLEP | DLEP peers. DLEP peers are comprised of a modem and a router. DLEP | |||
| defines a base set of mechanisms as well as support for future | defines a base set of mechanisms as well as support for future | |||
| extensions. DLEP defines Data Items, which are sets of information | extensions. DLEP defines Data Items, which are sets of information | |||
| that can be reused in DLEP messaging. The DLEP specification does | that can be reused in DLEP messaging. The DLEP specification does | |||
| not include any flow identification beyond DLEP endpoints, nor does | not include any flow identification beyond DLEP endpoints, nor does | |||
| it address flow control capability. Various flow control techniques | it address flow control capability. Various flow control techniques | |||
| are theoretically possible with DLEP. For example, a credit-window | are theoretically possible with DLEP. For example, a credit window | |||
| scheme for destination-specific flow control that provides aggregate | scheme for destination-specific flow control that provides aggregate | |||
| flow control for both modems and routers has been proposed in | flow control for both modems and routers has been proposed in | |||
| [Credit-Window-Extension], and a mechanism referred to as the | [Credit-Window-Extension], and a mechanism referred to as the | |||
| Control-Plane-Based Pause Extension is defined in [RFC8651]. The use | Control-Plane-Based Pause Extension is defined in [RFC8651]. The use | |||
| of other flow control mechanisms simultaneously with credit-based | of other flow control mechanisms simultaneously with credit-based | |||
| flow control is not within the scope of this document. | flow control is not within the scope of this document. | |||
| Credit-based flow control, as a result of its proactive nature, may | Credit-based flow control, as a result of its proactive nature, may | |||
| offer some advantages over a pause mechanism. Packet loss resulting | offer some advantages over a pause mechanism. Packet loss resulting | |||
| from insufficient buffer space is less likely, as a transmitter does | from insufficient buffer space is less likely, as a transmitter does | |||
| skipping to change at line 141 ¶ | skipping to change at line 144 ¶ | |||
| DSCP: Differentiated Services Code Point | DSCP: Differentiated Services Code Point | |||
| FID: Flow Identifier | FID: Flow Identifier | |||
| PCP: Priority Code Point | PCP: Priority Code Point | |||
| TID: Traffic Classification Identifier | TID: Traffic Classification Identifier | |||
| Figure 1: Router and Modem DLEP Exchange | Figure 1: Router and Modem DLEP Exchange | |||
| This document defines DLEP Data Items that provide a flow control | This document defines DLEP Data Items that provide a flow control | |||
| mechanism for traffic sent from a router to a modem. Flow control is | mechanism for traffic sent from a router to a modem. Flow control is | |||
| provided using one or more logical "Credit Windows", each of which | provided using one or more logical "credit windows", each of which | |||
| will typically be supported by an associated virtual or physical | will typically be supported by an associated virtual or physical | |||
| queue. Credit windows may be shared or dedicated on a per-flow | queue. Credit windows may be shared or dedicated on a per-flow | |||
| basis. The Data Items are structured to allow for the reuse of the | basis. The Data Items are structured to allow for the reuse of the | |||
| defined credit-window-based flow control with different traffic | defined credit-window-based flow control with different traffic | |||
| classification techniques. A router logically consumes credits for | classification techniques. A router logically consumes credits for | |||
| each credit window matching packet sent. | each credit window matching packet sent. | |||
| Note that this document defines common messages, Data Items, and | Note that this document defines common messages, Data Items, and | |||
| mechanisms that are reusable. They are expected to be required by | mechanisms that are reusable. They are expected to be required by | |||
| DLEP extensions defined in other documents, such as the extension | DLEP extensions defined in other documents, such as the extension | |||
| defined in [RFC9894]. | defined in [RFC9894]. | |||
| This document introduces support for credit window control by | This document introduces support for credit window flow control by | |||
| defining two new DLEP messages (Section 2.2) and five new DLEP Data | defining two new DLEP messages (Section 2.2) and five new DLEP Data | |||
| Items (Section 2.3). | Items (Section 2.3). | |||
| Various conditions described in this document cause a message to be | Various conditions described in this document cause a message to be | |||
| logged. In all cases, the log message results from the contents of a | logged. In all cases, the log message results from the contents of a | |||
| received Data Item defined here. No messages are logged in response | received Data Item defined here. No messages are logged in response | |||
| to activity in the data plane. | to activity in the data plane. | |||
| 1.1. Key Words | 1.1. Key Words | |||
| The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
| "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | |||
| "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in | "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in | |||
| BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | |||
| capitals, as shown here. | capitals, as shown here. | |||
| 2. Credit Window Control | 2. Credit Window Flow Control | |||
| This section defines additions to DLEP used in credit-based flow | This section defines additions to DLEP used in credit-based flow | |||
| control. The use of credit window control impacts the data plane. | control. The additions provide the DLEP mechanisms to control | |||
| credits. Routers then use this information to regulate when data is | ||||
| sent to a modem. | ||||
| The credit window control mechanisms defined in this document support | The credit window flow control mechanisms defined in this document | |||
| credit-based flow control of traffic sent from a router to a modem. | support credit-based flow control of traffic sent from a router to a | |||
| The mapping of specific flows to a particular credit window is based | modem. The mapping of specific flows to a particular credit window | |||
| on the Traffic Classification Data Item defined in [RFC9892]. Both | is based on the Traffic Classification Data Item defined in | |||
| types of DLEP peers -- router and modem -- negotiate the use of an | [RFC9892]. Both types of DLEP peers -- router and modem -- negotiate | |||
| extension employing this mechanism during session initialization as | the use of an extension employing this mechanism during session | |||
| required; for example, see [RFC9894]. When using credit windows, | initialization as required; for example, see [RFC9894]. When using | |||
| data traffic is only allowed to be sent by the router to the modem | credit windows, data traffic is only allowed to be sent by the router | |||
| when there are credits available. | to the modem when there are credits available. | |||
| Credits are managed on a 'per logical "Credit Window"' basis. Each | Credits are managed on a 'per logical "credit window"' basis. Each | |||
| credit window can be thought of as corresponding to a queue within a | credit window can be thought of as corresponding to a queue within a | |||
| modem. Credit windows may be shared across, or dedicated to, | modem. Credit windows may be shared across, or dedicated to, | |||
| destinations and data plane identifiers -- for example, DSCPs -- at a | destinations and data plane identifiers -- for example, DSCPs -- at a | |||
| granularity that is appropriate for a modem's implementation and its | granularity that is appropriate for a modem's implementation and its | |||
| attached transmission technology. As specified in Section 2.3.1, | attached transmission technology. As specified in Section 2.3.1, | |||
| there is a direct one-to-one mapping of credit windows to flows as | there is a direct one-to-one mapping of credit windows to flows as | |||
| identified by Flow Identifiers (FIDs) carried within the Traffic | identified by Flow Identifiers (FIDs) carried within the Traffic | |||
| Classification Data Item. Modems pass to the router information on | Classification Data Item. Modems pass to the router information on | |||
| their credit windows and FIDs prior to a router being able to send | their credit windows and FIDs prior to a router being able to send | |||
| data when an extension requiring the use of credit window control is | data when an extension requiring the use of credit window flow | |||
| used. Note that Traffic Classification Identifier (TID) values and | control is used. Note that Traffic Classification Identifier (TID) | |||
| FID values are significant only to the issuing modem. There is no | values and FID values are significant only to the issuing modem. | |||
| relationship implied by the same TID or FID value being issued by | There is no relationship implied by the same TID or FID value being | |||
| more than one modem. In addition to the traffic classification | issued by more than one modem. In addition to the traffic | |||
| information associated with a FID, modems provide an initial credit | classification information associated with a FID, modems provide an | |||
| window size, as well as the maximum size of the logical queue | initial credit window size, as well as the maximum size of the | |||
| associated with each credit window. The maximum size is included for | logical queue associated with each credit window. The maximum size | |||
| informative and potential future uses. | is included for informative and potential future uses. | |||
| Modems provide an initial credit window size at the time of "Credit | Modems provide an initial credit window size at the time of credit | |||
| Window Initialization". Such initialization can take place during | window initialization. Such initialization can take place during | |||
| session initiation or any point thereafter. It can also take place | session initiation or any point thereafter. It can also take place | |||
| when rate information changes. An increment to a credit window size, | when rate information changes. An increment to a credit window size, | |||
| specified in a Credit Grant Data Item, is provided in a Destination | specified in a Credit Window Grant Data Item, is provided in a | |||
| Up Message (Section 2.3.2) or Credit Control Message (Section 2.2.1). | Destination Up Message (Section 2.3.2) or Credit Control Message | |||
| A router provides its view of the Credit Window, which is known as | (Section 2.2.1). A router provides its view of the credit window, | |||
| "Status", in Destination Up Response Messages (Section 2.3.3) and | which is known as "Status", in Destination Up Response Messages | |||
| Credit Control Response Messages (Section 2.2.2). Routers can also | (Section 2.3.3) and Credit Control Response Messages (Section 2.2.2). | |||
| request credits using the Credit Control Message. | Routers can also request credits using the Credit Control Message. | |||
| When modems provide credits to a router, they will need to take into | When modems provide credits to a router, they will need to take into | |||
| account any overhead of their attached transmission technology and | account any overhead of their attached transmission technology and | |||
| map it into the credit semantics defined in this document. In | map it into the credit semantics defined in this document. In | |||
| particular, the credit window is defined below to include per-frame | particular, the credit window is defined below to include per-frame | |||
| (per-packet) Media Access Control (MAC) headers, and this may not | (per-packet) Media Access Control (MAC) headers, and this may not | |||
| match the actual overhead of the modems' attached transmission | match the actual overhead of the modems' attached transmission | |||
| technology. In that case, a direct mapping or an approximation will | technology. In that case, a direct mapping or an approximation will | |||
| need to be made by the modem to provide appropriate credit values. | need to be made by the modem to provide appropriate credit values. | |||
| skipping to change at line 255 ¶ | skipping to change at line 260 ¶ | |||
| support router traffic classification, based on the FIDs contained in | support router traffic classification, based on the FIDs contained in | |||
| the TID; see [RFC9892]. As defined, each credit window has a | the TID; see [RFC9892]. As defined, each credit window has a | |||
| corresponding FID, so traffic is mapped to a credit window by | corresponding FID, so traffic is mapped to a credit window by | |||
| locating a matching FID that is contained in the TID that is | locating a matching FID that is contained in the TID that is | |||
| associated with the traffic's destination. This means that the use | associated with the traffic's destination. This means that the use | |||
| of FIDs and TIDs, and the association of a TID to a DLEP destination, | of FIDs and TIDs, and the association of a TID to a DLEP destination, | |||
| enable a modem to share or dedicate resources as needed to match the | enable a modem to share or dedicate resources as needed to match the | |||
| specifics of its implementation and its attached transmission | specifics of its implementation and its attached transmission | |||
| technology. | technology. | |||
| Credit window control as defined in this document has objectives | Credit window flow control as defined in this document has objectives | |||
| similar to the control technique described in | similar to the control technique described in | |||
| [Credit-Window-Extension]. One notable difference from that type of | [Credit-Window-Extension]. One notable difference from that type of | |||
| credit control is that in this document, credits are never provided | credit control is that in this document, credits are never provided | |||
| by the router to the modem. | by the router to the modem. | |||
| 2.1. Data Plane Considerations | 2.1. Data Plane Considerations | |||
| When credit windowing is used, a router MUST NOT send data traffic to | When credit windowing is used, a router MUST NOT send data traffic to | |||
| a modem for forwarding if there is no matching classifier. If a | a modem for forwarding if there is no matching classifier. If a | |||
| matching classifier is found, a router MUST NOT send data traffic to | matching classifier is found, a router MUST NOT send data traffic to | |||
| a modem when there are no credits available in the associated Credit | a modem when there are no credits available in the associated credit | |||
| Window. Section 2 describes how classifiers are associated with | window. Section 2 describes how classifiers are associated with | |||
| destinations and how credit windows are associated with classifiers. | destinations and how credit windows are associated with classifiers. | |||
| Additionally, a router MUST ensure that sufficient credits are | Additionally, a router MUST ensure that sufficient credits are | |||
| available in the associated Credit Window for the current data packet | available in the associated credit window for the current data packet | |||
| before sending that data packet to the modem. The count of octets in | before sending that data packet to the modem. The count of octets in | |||
| the packet includes MAC overhead. Taking Ethernet as an example, | the packet includes MAC overhead. Taking Ethernet as an example, | |||
| framing, header, and trailer are all included in this count. This | framing, header, and trailer are all included in this count. This | |||
| document defines credit windows in octets, and the credit window is | document defines credit windows in octets, and the credit window is | |||
| decremented by the number of sent octets. | decremented by the number of sent octets. | |||
| A router MUST identify the credit window associated with traffic to | A router MUST identify the credit window associated with traffic to | |||
| be sent to a modem based on the traffic classification information | be sent to a modem based on the traffic classification information | |||
| provided in the Data Items defined in this document. | provided in the Data Items defined in this document. | |||
| 2.2. Credit Window Messages | 2.2. Credit Window Messages | |||
| This document defines two new messages that support credit window | This document defines two new messages that support credit window | |||
| control: Credit Control Messages and Credit Control Response | flow control: Credit Control Messages and Credit Control Response | |||
| Messages. Sending and receiving both message types is REQUIRED to | Messages. Sending and receiving both message types is REQUIRED to | |||
| support the credit window control mechanisms defined in this | support the credit window flow control mechanisms defined in this | |||
| document. | document. | |||
| 2.2.1. Credit Control Message | 2.2.1. Credit Control Message | |||
| Credit Control Messages are sent by modems and routers. Each sender | Credit Control Messages are sent by modems and routers. Each sender | |||
| is only permitted to have one message outstanding at one time. That | is only permitted to have one message outstanding at one time. That | |||
| is, a sender (either modem or router) MUST NOT send a subsequent | is, a sender (either modem or router) MUST NOT send a subsequent | |||
| Credit Control Message until a Credit Control Response Message has | Credit Control Message until a Credit Control Response Message has | |||
| been received from its peer. | been received from its peer. | |||
| Credit Control Messages are sent by modems to provide credit window | Credit Control Messages are sent by modems to provide credit window | |||
| increases. Modems send credit increases when their transmission or | increases. Modems send credit increases when their transmission or | |||
| local queue availability exceeds the credit window value previously | local queue availability exceeds the credit window value previously | |||
| provided to the router. Modems will need to balance the load | provided to the router. Modems will need to balance the load | |||
| generated by sending and processing credit window increases against a | generated by sending and processing credit window increases against a | |||
| router having data traffic available to send, but no credits | router having data traffic available to send but no available | |||
| available. | credits. | |||
| Credit Control Messages MAY be sent by routers to request credits and | Credit Control Messages MAY be sent by routers to request credits and | |||
| provide window status. Routers will need to balance the load | provide window status. Routers will need to balance the load | |||
| generated by sending and processing credit window requests against | generated by sending and processing credit window requests against | |||
| having data traffic available to send, but no credits available. | having data traffic available to send but no available credits. | |||
| The Message Type value in the DLEP Message Header is set to 17. | The Message Type value in the DLEP Message Header is set to 17. | |||
| A Credit Control Message sent by a modem MUST contain one or more | A Credit Control Message sent by a modem MUST contain one or more | |||
| Credit Window Grant Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.3. A router | Credit Window Grant Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.3. A router | |||
| receiving this message MUST respond with a Credit Control Response | receiving this message MUST respond with a Credit Control Response | |||
| Message. | Message. | |||
| A Credit Control Message sent by a router MUST contain one or more | A Credit Control Message sent by a router MUST contain one or more | |||
| Credit Window Request Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.5 and | Credit Window Request Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.5 and | |||
| skipping to change at line 332 ¶ | skipping to change at line 337 ¶ | |||
| Message based on the received message and Data Item and the | Message based on the received message and Data Item and the | |||
| processing defined in Section 2.2.2, which will typically result in | processing defined in Section 2.2.2, which will typically result in | |||
| credit window increments being provided. | credit window increments being provided. | |||
| Specific processing associated with each Credit Data Item is provided | Specific processing associated with each Credit Data Item is provided | |||
| in Section 2.3. | in Section 2.3. | |||
| 2.2.2. Credit Control Response Message | 2.2.2. Credit Control Response Message | |||
| Credit Control Response Messages are sent by routers to report the | Credit Control Response Messages are sent by routers to report the | |||
| current Credit Window for a destination. A Credit Control Response | current credit window for a destination. A Credit Control Response | |||
| Message sent by a router MUST contain one or more Credit Window | Message sent by a router MUST contain one or more Credit Window | |||
| Status Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.4. Specific receive | Status Data Items as defined in Section 2.3.4. Specific receive | |||
| processing associated with the Credit Window Status Data Item is | processing associated with the Credit Window Status Data Item is | |||
| provided in Section 2.3.4. | provided in Section 2.3.4. | |||
| Credit Control Response Messages sent by modems MUST contain one or | Credit Control Response Messages sent by modems MUST contain one or | |||
| more Credit Window Grant Data Items. A Data Item for every Credit | more Credit Window Grant Data Items. A Data Item for every Credit | |||
| Window Request Data Item contained in the corresponding Credit | Window Request Data Item contained in the corresponding Credit | |||
| Control Message received by the modem MUST be included. Each Credit | Control Message received by the modem MUST be included. Each Credit | |||
| Grant Data Item MAY provide zero or more additional credits based on | Window Grant Data Item MAY provide zero or more additional credits | |||
| the modem's transmission or local queue availability. Specific | based on the modem's transmission or local queue availability. | |||
| receive processing associated with each Grant Data Item is provided | Specific receive processing associated with each Credit Window Grant | |||
| in Section 2.3.3. | Data Item is provided in Section 2.3.3. | |||
| The Message Type value in the DLEP Message Header is set to 18. | The Message Type value in the DLEP Message Header is set to 18. | |||
| 2.3. Credit Window Control Data Items | 2.3. Data Items for the Control of Credit Windows | |||
| Five new Data Items are defined to support credit window control: | Five new Data Items are defined to support the control of credit | |||
| windows: | ||||
| * The Credit Window Initialization Data Item (Section 2.3.1) is used | * The Credit Window Initialization Data Item (Section 2.3.1) is used | |||
| by a modem to identify a credit window and set its size. | by a modem to identify a credit window and set its size. | |||
| * The Credit Window Association Data Item (Section 2.3.2) is used by | * The Credit Window Association Data Item (Section 2.3.2) is used by | |||
| a modem to identify which TIDs (flows) should be used when sending | a modem to identify which TIDs (flows) should be used when sending | |||
| traffic to a particular DLEP-identified destination. | traffic to a particular DLEP-identified destination. | |||
| * The Credit Window Grant Data Item (Section 2.3.3) is used by a | * The Credit Window Grant Data Item (Section 2.3.3) is used by a | |||
| modem to provide additional credits to a router. | modem to provide additional credits to a router. | |||
| skipping to change at line 374 ¶ | skipping to change at line 380 ¶ | |||
| advertise the sender's view of the number of available credits for | advertise the sender's view of the number of available credits for | |||
| state synchronization purposes. | state synchronization purposes. | |||
| * The Credit Window Request Data Item (Section 2.3.5) is used by a | * The Credit Window Request Data Item (Section 2.3.5) is used by a | |||
| router to request additional credits. | router to request additional credits. | |||
| Any errors or inconsistencies encountered in parsing Data Items are | Any errors or inconsistencies encountered in parsing Data Items are | |||
| handled in the same fashion as any other Data Item parsing error | handled in the same fashion as any other Data Item parsing error | |||
| encountered in DLEP; see [RFC8175]. In particular, the node parsing | encountered in DLEP; see [RFC8175]. In particular, the node parsing | |||
| the Data Item MUST terminate the session with a Status Data Item | the Data Item MUST terminate the session with a Status Data Item | |||
| indicating "Invalid Data". | [RFC8175] indicating "Invalid Data". | |||
| 2.3.1. Credit Window Initialization | 2.3.1. Credit Window Initialization | |||
| As noted above, the Credit Window Initialization Data Item is used by | As noted above, the Credit Window Initialization Data Item is used by | |||
| a modem to identify a credit window and set its size. In order to | a modem to identify a credit window and set its size. In order to | |||
| avoid errors caused by the use of undefined FIDs or uninitialized | avoid errors caused by the use of undefined FIDs or uninitialized | |||
| credit windows, this Data Item SHOULD be included in any Session | credit windows, this Data Item SHOULD be included in any Session | |||
| Initialization Response Message that indicates support for any such | Initialization Response Message that indicates support for any such | |||
| extension. Updates to previously identified credit windows or new | extension. Updates to previously identified credit windows or new | |||
| credit windows MAY be sent by a modem by including the Data Item in | credit windows MAY be sent by a modem by including the Data Item in | |||
| skipping to change at line 434 ¶ | skipping to change at line 440 ¶ | |||
| window for a specific DLEP session. | window for a specific DLEP session. | |||
| Reserved: | Reserved: | |||
| For the Credit Window Initialization Data Item, this reserved | For the Credit Window Initialization Data Item, this reserved | |||
| field is currently unused. It MUST be set to all zeros for this | field is currently unused. It MUST be set to all zeros for this | |||
| version of the Data Item and is currently ignored on reception. | version of the Data Item and is currently ignored on reception. | |||
| This allows for future extensions of the Data Item if needed. | This allows for future extensions of the Data Item if needed. | |||
| Credit Value: | Credit Value: | |||
| A 64-bit unsigned integer representing the credits, in octets, to | A 64-bit unsigned integer representing the credits, in octets, to | |||
| be added to the Credit Window. This value includes MAC headers as | be added to the credit window. This value includes MAC headers as | |||
| seen on the link between the modem and router. | seen on the link between the modem and router. | |||
| Scale: | Scale: | |||
| An 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the scale used in the Credit | An 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the scale used in the Credit | |||
| Window Max Size field. The valid values are as follows: | Window Max Size field. The valid values are as follows: | |||
| +=======+=========================+ | +=======+=========================+ | |||
| | Value | Scale | | | Value | Scale | | |||
| +=======+=========================+ | +=======+=========================+ | |||
| | 0 | B: Bytes (Octets) | | | 0 | B: Bytes (Octets) | | |||
| skipping to change at line 473 ¶ | skipping to change at line 479 ¶ | |||
| message or a previous message. If the FID cannot be found, the | message or a previous message. If the FID cannot be found, the | |||
| router SHOULD log this information. The method of logging is left to | router SHOULD log this information. The method of logging is left to | |||
| the router implementation. Note that no traffic will be associated | the router implementation. Note that no traffic will be associated | |||
| with the credit window in this case. After FID validation, the | with the credit window in this case. After FID validation, the | |||
| router MUST locate the credit window that is associated with the FID | router MUST locate the credit window that is associated with the FID | |||
| indicated in each received Data Item. If no associated credit window | indicated in each received Data Item. If no associated credit window | |||
| is found, the router MUST initialize a new credit window using the | is found, the router MUST initialize a new credit window using the | |||
| values carried in the Data Item. When an associated credit window is | values carried in the Data Item. When an associated credit window is | |||
| found, the router MUST update the credit window and associated data | found, the router MUST update the credit window and associated data | |||
| plane state using the values carried in the Data Item. If the | plane state using the values carried in the Data Item. If the | |||
| resultant Credit Value in turn results in the credit window exceeding | resultant credit value results in the credit window exceeding the | |||
| the represented Credit Window Max Size, the Credit Window Max Size | represented Credit Window Max Size, the Credit Window Max Size field | |||
| field value is used as the new credit window size. | value is used as the new credit window size. | |||
| It is worth noting that such updates can result in a credit window | It is worth noting that such updates can result in a credit window | |||
| size being reduced -- for example, due to a transmission rate change | size being reduced -- for example, due to a transmission rate change | |||
| on the modem. After sending the Session Update Message with one or | on the modem. After sending the Session Update Message with one or | |||
| more Credit Window Initialization Data Items that decrease the Credit | more Credit Window Initialization Data Items that decrease the Credit | |||
| Window Max Size, the modem SHOULD continue processing received | Window Max Size, the modem SHOULD continue processing received | |||
| packets that match the indicated FIDs, fit within the window for the | packets that match the indicated FIDs, fit within the window for the | |||
| unmodified Credit Window Max Size, and arrive before the modem | unmodified Credit Window Max Size, and arrive before the modem | |||
| receives the corresponding Session Update Response Message. The | receives the corresponding Session Update Response Message. The | |||
| modem SHOULD NOT issue additional credits for any affected FID until | modem SHOULD NOT issue additional credits for any affected FID until | |||
| skipping to change at line 502 ¶ | skipping to change at line 508 ¶ | |||
| The Credit Window Association Data Item is used by a modem to | The Credit Window Association Data Item is used by a modem to | |||
| associate traffic classification information with a destination. The | associate traffic classification information with a destination. The | |||
| traffic classification information is identified using a TID value | traffic classification information is identified using a TID value | |||
| that has been previously sent by the modem or is listed in a Traffic | that has been previously sent by the modem or is listed in a Traffic | |||
| Classification Data Item carried in the same message as the Credit | Classification Data Item carried in the same message as the Credit | |||
| Window Association Data Item. TIDs in different credit windows must | Window Association Data Item. TIDs in different credit windows must | |||
| not overlap. | not overlap. | |||
| A single Credit Window Association Data Item MUST be included in | A single Credit Window Association Data Item MUST be included in | |||
| every Destination Up and Destination Update Message sent by a modem | every Destination Up and Destination Update Message sent by a modem | |||
| when a credit window control mechanism defined in this document is | when a credit window flow control mechanism defined in this document | |||
| used. Note that a TID will not be used unless it is listed in a | is used. Note that a TID will not be used unless it is listed in a | |||
| Credit Window Association Data Item. | Credit Window Association Data Item. | |||
| The format of the Credit Window Association Data Item is as follows: | The format of the Credit Window Association Data Item is as follows: | |||
| 0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | Data Item Type | Length (2) | | | Data Item Type | Length (2) | | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| |Traffic Class. Identifier (TID)| | |Traffic Class. Identifier (TID)| | |||
| skipping to change at line 594 ¶ | skipping to change at line 600 ¶ | |||
| Data Item. The FID also uniquely indicates a credit window. | Data Item. The FID also uniquely indicates a credit window. | |||
| Reserved: | Reserved: | |||
| For the Credit Window Grant Data Item, this reserved field is | For the Credit Window Grant Data Item, this reserved field is | |||
| currently unused. It MUST be set to all zeros for this version of | currently unused. It MUST be set to all zeros for this version of | |||
| the Data Item and is currently ignored on reception. This allows | the Data Item and is currently ignored on reception. This allows | |||
| for future extensions of the Data Item if needed. | for future extensions of the Data Item if needed. | |||
| Additional Credits: | Additional Credits: | |||
| A 64-bit unsigned integer representing the credits, in octets, to | A 64-bit unsigned integer representing the credits, in octets, to | |||
| be added to the Credit Window. This value includes MAC headers as | be added to the credit window. This value includes MAC headers as | |||
| seen on the link between the modem and router. A value of zero | seen on the link between the modem and router. A value of zero | |||
| indicates that no additional credits are being provided. | indicates that no additional credits are being provided. | |||
| When receiving this Data Item, a router MUST identify the credit | When receiving this Data Item, a router MUST identify the credit | |||
| window indicated by the FID. If the FID is not known to the router, | window indicated by the FID. If the FID is not known to the router, | |||
| it SHOULD log this information and discard the Data Item. The method | it SHOULD log this information and discard the Data Item. The method | |||
| of logging is left to the router implementation. It is important to | of logging is left to the router implementation. It is important to | |||
| note that while this Data Item can be received in a destination- | note that while this Data Item can be received in a destination- | |||
| specific message, credit windows are managed independently of the | specific message, credit windows are managed independently of the | |||
| destination identified in the message carrying this Data Item, and | destination identified in the message carrying this Data Item, and | |||
| the indicated FID MAY even be disjoint from the identified | the indicated FID MAY even be disjoint from the identified | |||
| destination. | destination. | |||
| Once the credit window is identified, the credit window size MUST be | Once the credit window is identified, the credit window size MUST be | |||
| increased by the value contained in the Additional Credits field. If | increased by the value contained in the Additional Credits field. If | |||
| the increase results in a window overflow, the Credit Window must be | the increase results in a window overflow, the credit window must be | |||
| set to its maximum as defined by the Credit Window Max Size carried | set to its maximum as defined by the Credit Window Max Size carried | |||
| in the Credit Window Initialization Data Item. | in the Credit Window Initialization Data Item. | |||
| No response is sent by the router to a modem after processing a | No response is sent by the router to a modem after processing a | |||
| Credit Window Grant Data Item received in a Credit Control Response | Credit Window Grant Data Item received in a Credit Control Response | |||
| Message. When a Credit Window Grant Data Item is received in other | Message. For each Credit Window Grant Data Item received in other | |||
| message types, the receiving router MUST send a Credit Window Status | message types, the receiving router MUST send a Credit Window Status | |||
| Data Item or items reflecting the resultant Credit Window value of | Data Item reflecting the resultant credit window value of the updated | |||
| the updated credit window. When the Credit Grant Data Item is | credit windows. When the Credit Window Grant Data Item is received | |||
| received in a Destination Up Message, the Credit Window Status Data | in a Destination Up Message, the Credit Window Status Data Item(s) | |||
| Item(s) MUST be sent in the corresponding Destination Up Response | MUST be sent in the corresponding Destination Up Response Message. | |||
| Message. Otherwise, a Credit Control Message MUST be sent. | Otherwise, a Credit Control Message MUST be sent. | |||
| 2.3.4. Credit Window Status | 2.3.4. Credit Window Status | |||
| The Credit Window Status Data Item is used by a router to report the | The Credit Window Status Data Item is used by a router to report the | |||
| current credit window size to its peer modem. One or more Credit | current credit window size to its peer modem. One or more Credit | |||
| Window Status Data Items MAY be carried in a Destination Up Response | Window Status Data Items MAY be carried in a Destination Up Response | |||
| Message or a Credit Control Response Message. As discussed in | Message or a Credit Control Response Message. As discussed in | |||
| Section 2.3.3, the Destination Up Response Message is used when the | Section 2.3.3, the Destination Up Response Message is used when the | |||
| Data Item is sent in response to a Destination Up Message, and the | Data Item is sent in response to a Destination Up Message, and the | |||
| Credit Control Response Message is sent in response to a Credit | Credit Control Response Message is sent in response to a Credit | |||
| skipping to change at line 689 ¶ | skipping to change at line 695 ¶ | |||
| When receiving this Data Item, a modem MUST identify the credit | When receiving this Data Item, a modem MUST identify the credit | |||
| window indicated by the FID. If the FID is not known to the modem, | window indicated by the FID. If the FID is not known to the modem, | |||
| it SHOULD log this information and discard the Data Item. The method | it SHOULD log this information and discard the Data Item. The method | |||
| of logging is left to the modem implementation. As with the Credit | of logging is left to the modem implementation. As with the Credit | |||
| Window Grant Data Item, the FID MAY be unrelated to the destination | Window Grant Data Item, the FID MAY be unrelated to the destination | |||
| indicated in the message carrying the Data Item. | indicated in the message carrying the Data Item. | |||
| Once the credit window is identified, the modem SHOULD check the | Once the credit window is identified, the modem SHOULD check the | |||
| received Current Credit Window Size field value against the | received Current Credit Window Size field value against the | |||
| outstanding credit window's available credits at the time the most | outstanding credit window's available credits at the time the most | |||
| recent Credit Window Initialization or Grant Data Item associated | recent Credit Window Initialization or Credit Window Grant Data Item | |||
| with the indicated FID was sent. If the difference in values is | associated with the indicated FID was sent. If the difference in | |||
| greater than what can be accounted for based on observed data frames, | values is greater than what can be accounted for based on observed | |||
| then the modem SHOULD send a Credit Window Initialization Data Item | data frames, then the modem SHOULD send a Credit Window | |||
| to reset the associated credit window size to the modem's current | Initialization Data Item to reset the associated credit window size | |||
| view of the available credits. As specified in Section 2.3.1, Credit | to the modem's current view of the available credits. As specified | |||
| Window Initialization Data Items are sent in Session Update Messages. | in Section 2.3.1, Credit Window Initialization Data Items are sent in | |||
| When multiple Data Items need to be sent, they SHOULD be combined | Session Update Messages. When multiple Data Items need to be sent, | |||
| into a single message when possible. Alternatively, and also in | they SHOULD be combined into a single message when possible. | |||
| cases where there are small differences, the modem MAY adjust the | Alternatively, and also in cases where there are small differences, | |||
| values sent in Credit Window Grant Data Items to account for the | the modem MAY adjust the values sent in Credit Window Grant Data | |||
| reported Credit Window. | Items to account for the reported credit window. | |||
| 2.3.5. Credit Window Request | 2.3.5. Credit Window Request | |||
| The Credit Window Request Data Item is used by a router to request | The Credit Window Request Data Item is used by a router to request | |||
| additional credits for particular credit windows. Credit Window | additional credits for particular credit windows. Credit Window | |||
| Request Data Items are carried in Credit Control Messages, and one or | Request Data Items are carried in Credit Control Messages, and one or | |||
| more Credit Window Request Data Items MAY be present in a message. | more Credit Window Request Data Items MAY be present in a message. | |||
| Credit windows are identified using a FID as defined in | Credit windows are identified using a FID as defined in | |||
| Section 2.3.1. Multiple FIDs MAY be present to allow for the case | Section 2.3.1. Multiple FIDs MAY be present to allow for the case | |||
| where the router determines that credits are needed in multiple | where the router determines that credits are needed in multiple | |||
| credit windows. A special FID value, as defined below, is used to | credit windows. A special FID value, as defined below, is used to | |||
| indicate that a credit request is being made across all queues. | indicate that a credit window request is being made across all | |||
| queues. | ||||
| The format of the Credit Window Request Data Item is as follows: | The format of the Credit Window Request Data Item is as follows: | |||
| 0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | Data Item Type | Length | | | Data Item Type | Length | | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | Flow Identifier (FID) [1] | Flow Identifier (FID) [2] | | | Flow Identifier (FID) [1] | Flow Identifier (FID) [2] | | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | ... | Flow Identifier (FID) [n] | | | ... | Flow Identifier (FID) [n] | | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| Data Item Type: | Data Item Type: | |||
| 34 | 34 | |||
| Length: | Length: | |||
| Variable | Variable | |||
| As specified in [RFC8175], Length is the number of octets in the | As specified in [RFC8175], Length is the number of octets in the | |||
| Data Item, excluding the Type and Length fields. It is equal to | Data Item, excluding the Data Item Type and Length fields. It is | |||
| the number of FID fields carried in the Data Item times 2 and MUST | equal to the number of FID fields carried in the Data Item times 2 | |||
| be at least 2. If it is less than 2, the Data Item is corrupt, so | and MUST be at least 2. If it is less than 2, the Data Item is | |||
| the message in which it appears cannot be reliably parsed and is | corrupt, so the message in which it appears cannot be reliably | |||
| ignored. | parsed and is ignored. | |||
| Flow Identifier (FID): | Flow Identifier (FID): | |||
| A 2-octet flow identifier as defined by the Traffic Classification | A 2-octet flow identifier as defined by the Traffic Classification | |||
| Data Item. The FID also uniquely identifies a credit window. The | Data Item. The FID also uniquely identifies a credit window. The | |||
| special value 0xFFFF indicates that the request applies to all | special value 0xFFFF indicates that the request applies to all | |||
| FIDs. When this special value is included, all other FID values | FIDs. When this special value is included, all other FID values | |||
| included in the Data Item are redundant, as the special value | included in the Data Item are redundant, as the special value | |||
| indicates all FIDs. | indicates all FIDs. | |||
| A modem receiving this Data Item MUST provide a credit window | A modem receiving this Data Item MUST provide a credit window | |||
| increment for the indicated credit windows via Credit Window Grant | increment for the indicated credit windows via Credit Window Grant | |||
| Data Items carried in a new Credit Control Message. Multiple values | Data Items carried in a new Credit Control Message. Multiple values | |||
| and queue indexes SHOULD be combined into a single Credit Control | and queue indexes SHOULD be combined into a single Credit Control | |||
| Message when possible. Unknown FID values SHOULD be logged and then | Message when possible. Unknown FID values SHOULD be logged and then | |||
| ignored by the modem. The method of logging is left to the modem | ignored by the modem. The method of logging is left to the modem | |||
| implementation. | implementation. | |||
| 2.4. Management Considerations | 2.4. Management Considerations | |||
| This section provides several network management guidelines for | This section provides several network management guidelines for | |||
| implementations supporting the credit window mechanisms defined in | implementations supporting the credit window flow control mechanisms | |||
| this document. | defined in this document. | |||
| Modems MAY support the configuration of the number of credit windows | Modems MAY support the configuration of the number of credit windows | |||
| (queues) to advertise to a router. | (queues) to advertise to a router. | |||
| Routers may have limits on the number of queues that they can | Routers may have limits on the number of queues that they can | |||
| support. They may even have limits on supported credit window | support. They may even have limits on supported credit window | |||
| combinations. For example, per-destination queues may not be | combinations. For example, per-destination queues may not be | |||
| supported at all. When credit window information provided by a modem | supported at all. When credit window information provided by a modem | |||
| exceeds the capabilities of a router, the router SHOULD use a subset | exceeds the capabilities of a router, the router SHOULD use a subset | |||
| of the provided credit windows. Alternatively, a router MAY reset | of the provided credit windows. Alternatively, a router MAY reset | |||
| skipping to change at line 790 ¶ | skipping to change at line 797 ¶ | |||
| The messages and Data Items defined in this document will only be | The messages and Data Items defined in this document will only be | |||
| used when extensions require their use. | used when extensions require their use. | |||
| The DLEP specification [RFC8175] defines the handling of unexpected | The DLEP specification [RFC8175] defines the handling of unexpected | |||
| appearances of any Data Items, including those defined in this | appearances of any Data Items, including those defined in this | |||
| document. | document. | |||
| 4. Security Considerations | 4. Security Considerations | |||
| This document introduces credit window control and flow mechanisms | This document introduces credit window flow control mechanisms for | |||
| for DLEP. These mechanisms expose vulnerabilities similar to | DLEP. These mechanisms expose vulnerabilities similar to existing | |||
| existing DLEP messages. An example of a threat to which flow control | DLEP messages. An example of a threat to which flow control might be | |||
| might be susceptible is where a malicious actor masquerading as a | susceptible is where a malicious actor masquerading as a DLEP peer | |||
| DLEP peer could inject a Credit Window Initialization Data Item that | could inject a Credit Window Initialization Data Item that resizes a | |||
| resizes a credit window to a value that results in a denial of | credit window to a value that results in a denial of service. Other | |||
| service. Other possible threats are discussed in the Security | possible threats are discussed in the Security Considerations section | |||
| Considerations section of [RFC8175] and are also applicable, but not | of [RFC8175] and are also applicable, but not specific, to flow | |||
| specific, to flow control. The transport-layer security mechanisms | control. The transport-layer security mechanisms documented in | |||
| documented in [RFC8175], with some updated references to external | [RFC8175], along with the latest version of [BCP195] at the time of | |||
| documents listed below, can be applied to this document. | this writing, can be applied to this document. Implementations | |||
| Implementations following the "networked deployment" model described | following the "networked deployment" model described in Section 4 | |||
| in Section 4 ("Implementation Scenarios") of [RFC8175] SHOULD refer | ("Implementation Scenarios") of [RFC8175] SHOULD refer to [BCP195] | |||
| to [BCP195] for additional details. The Layer 2 security mechanisms | for additional details. The Layer 2 security mechanisms documented | |||
| documented in [RFC8175] can also, with some updates, be applied to | in [RFC8175] can also, with some updates, be applied to the | |||
| the mechanisms defined in this document. Examples of technologies | mechanisms defined in this document. Examples of technologies that | |||
| that can be deployed to secure the Layer 2 link include | can be deployed to secure the Layer 2 link include [IEEE-802.1AE] and | |||
| [IEEE-802.1AE] and [IEEE-8802-1X]. | [IEEE-8802-1X]. | |||
| 5. IANA Considerations | 5. IANA Considerations | |||
| 5.1. Message Type Values | 5.1. Message Type Values | |||
| IANA has assigned two new values from the "Specification Required" | IANA has assigned two new values from the "Specification Required" | |||
| range [RFC8126] in the DLEP "Message Type Values" registry: | range [RFC8126] in the DLEP "Message Type Values" registry: | |||
| +===========+=========================+ | +===========+=========================+ | |||
| | Type Code | Description | | | Type Code | Description | | |||
| skipping to change at line 869 ¶ | skipping to change at line 876 ¶ | |||
| May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | |||
| [RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B. | [RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B. | |||
| Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175, | Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017, | DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8175>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8175>. | |||
| [RFC9892] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Fedyk, Ed., | [RFC9892] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Fedyk, Ed., | |||
| "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Traffic | "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Traffic | |||
| Classification Data Item", RFC 9892, DOI 10.17487/RFC9892, | Classification Data Item", RFC 9892, DOI 10.17487/RFC9892, | |||
| November 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9892>. | December 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9892>. | |||
| 6.2. Informative References | 6.2. Informative References | |||
| [BCP195] Best Current Practice 195, | [BCP195] Best Current Practice 195, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp195>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp195>. | |||
| At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following: | At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following: | |||
| Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS | Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS | |||
| 1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021, | 1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8996>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8996>. | |||
| skipping to change at line 896 ¶ | skipping to change at line 903 ¶ | |||
| [Credit-Window-Extension] | [Credit-Window-Extension] | |||
| Ratliff, S., "Credit Windowing extension for DLEP", Work | Ratliff, S., "Credit Windowing extension for DLEP", Work | |||
| in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-credit- | in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-credit- | |||
| window-07, 13 November 2016, | window-07, 13 November 2016, | |||
| <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet- | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet- | |||
| credit-window-07>. | credit-window-07>. | |||
| [IEEE-802.1AE] | [IEEE-802.1AE] | |||
| IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area | IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area | |||
| networks-Media Access Control (MAC) Security Amendment 4: | networks-Media Access Control (MAC) Security", | |||
| MAC Privacy protection", DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8585421, | DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8585421, IEEE Std 802.1AE-2018, | |||
| December 2018, | December 2018, | |||
| <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8585421>. | <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8585421>. | |||
| [IEEE-8802-1X] | [IEEE-8802-1X] | |||
| IEEE, "IEEE/ISO/IEC International Standard- | IEEE, "IEEE/ISO/IEC International Standard- | |||
| Telecommunications and exchange between information | Telecommunications and exchange between information | |||
| technology systems--Requirements for local and | technology systems--Requirements for local and | |||
| metropolitan area networks--Part 1X:Port-based network | metropolitan area networks--Part 1X:Port-based network | |||
| access control", DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9650828, IEEE | access control", DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9650828, IEEE | |||
| Std 8802-1X-2021, December 2021, | Std 8802-1X-2021, December 2021, | |||
| skipping to change at line 928 ¶ | skipping to change at line 935 ¶ | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. | |||
| [RFC8651] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., and L. Berger, Ed., "Dynamic Link | [RFC8651] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., and L. Berger, Ed., "Dynamic Link | |||
| Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Control-Plane-Based Pause | Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Control-Plane-Based Pause | |||
| Extension", RFC 8651, DOI 10.17487/RFC8651, October 2019, | Extension", RFC 8651, DOI 10.17487/RFC8651, October 2019, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8651>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8651>. | |||
| [RFC9894] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Eastlake 3rd, | [RFC9894] Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Eastlake 3rd, | |||
| Ed., "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware | Ed., "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware | |||
| Credit Window Extension", RFC 9894, DOI 10.17487/RFC9894, | Credit Window Extension", RFC 9894, DOI 10.17487/RFC9894, | |||
| November 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9894>. | December 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9894>. | |||
| [RFC9895] Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Eastlake 3rd, Ed., | [RFC9895] Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Eastlake 3rd, Ed., | |||
| "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) IEEE 802.1Q Aware | "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) IEEE 802.1Q Aware | |||
| Credit Window Extension", RFC 9895, DOI 10.17487/RFC9895, | Credit Window Extension", RFC 9895, DOI 10.17487/RFC9895, | |||
| November 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9895>. | December 2025, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9895>. | |||
| Appendix A. Example DLEP Credit Flow Control and Traffic Classification | Appendix A. Example DLEP Credit Flow Control and Traffic Classification | |||
| Data Item Exchange | Data Item Exchange | |||
| Figure 2 illustrates a credit flow control and traffic classification | Figure 2 illustrates a credit flow control and traffic classification | |||
| exchange between a router and a modem. The modem will initialize a | exchange between a router and a modem. The modem will initialize a | |||
| number of queues with Credit Window Initialization Data Items, Credit | number of queues with Credit Window Initialization Data Items, Credit | |||
| Window Association Data Item(s), and Traffic Classification Data | Window Association Data Item(s), and Traffic Classification Data | |||
| Item(s) included in DLEP messages as outlined in this document. If | Item(s) included in DLEP messages as outlined in this document. If | |||
| the Data Items are successfully validated, traffic is mapped to the | the Data Items are successfully validated, traffic is mapped to the | |||
| End of changes. 43 change blocks. | ||||
| 110 lines changed or deleted | 117 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. | ||||